Some of the 19th and 20th century followers of Darwin hit on a novel way to speed up the "natural selection" process. Their ideas led to the development of what is called "eugenics." Please read through the Wikipedia summary of the eugenics movement. What do you see here that suggests that there is a dark side to the Darwinian idea of progress?
Thursday, October 29, 2015
The Eugenics Movement (extra credit)
Some of the 19th and 20th century followers of Darwin hit on a novel way to speed up the "natural selection" process. Their ideas led to the development of what is called "eugenics." Please read through the Wikipedia summary of the eugenics movement. What do you see here that suggests that there is a dark side to the Darwinian idea of progress?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Darwinian idea of progress has a very dark side because Darwin suggests to get rid of all the humans that are not "fit" for the society. The people unfit for society would be all mentally and physically disabled, low IQ scores, criminals and minority groups. A great example for Darwin's theory is Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. Hitler eliminated 12 million people because they wanted to be pure of the Jewish people. Therefore, I would say this conveys a very dark side to humans and how power one theory can take over human minds.
ReplyDeleteIn lecture we heard that the idea of natural selection was not "new" and that even Darwin gave a tip of the hat to Edward Blyth. Blaming Darwin for the the genocides of WWII is like blaming Tesla for the people ran over by a Tesla Model S. Genocide was around long before Darwin or Hitler. The extermination of the Midianites is an example.
ReplyDeleteDespite Darwin's displeasure with the natural selection happening in mankind, it was Francis Galton who coined the term eugenics but even that was long after Plato had suggested selective mating.
Yes, mankind is capable of horrific atrocities, but to blame it on Darwinian followers seems to be scapegoating. Why not call it Platoinan or Aristotleian?
Each of us are responsible for our own actions. Darwin is not responsible for our actions no more than the DJ who plays a song on the radio, no matter how crappy the lyrics may be.
- Matthew Traylor
This play on Darwin's words are dark and manipulative. Natural selection was never intended to PERFECT the human race but to be an explanation for our advances and our methods of improving our survival skills. Eugenics twisted this theory into something almost immoral. Darwin, from what I understand, never intended this to be perceived this way. He wanted a reason for our positive improvements not to point out what we were missing but just to shed light on the world and give us faith that we are indeed improving.
ReplyDelete-Katelyn Dickey